GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Quadro RTX A6000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX A6000 with GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX A6000
2020
48 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
58.48
+133%

RTX A6000 outperforms RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.40no data
Power efficiency13.4128.82
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA102GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107522560
Core clock speed1410 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speed1800 MHz1492 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate604.8no data
Floating-point processing power38.71 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112no data
TMUs336no data
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth768.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4ano data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A6000 58.48
+133%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.13

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A6000 50957
+193%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A6000 27511
+130%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A6000 113167
+56.1%
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX A6000 494750
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 500518
+1.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD158
+123%
71
−123%
1440p123
+262%
34
−262%
4K106
+136%
45−50
−136%

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.42no data
1440p37.80no data
4K43.86no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 160−170
+160%
65−70
−160%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+196%
45−50
−196%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+64.2%
81
−64.2%
Atomic Heart 160−170
+160%
65−70
−160%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+69.1%
90−95
−69.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+196%
45−50
−196%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+108%
64
−108%
Far Cry 5 52
−59.6%
83
+59.6%
Fortnite 240−250
+105%
110−120
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+122%
90−95
−122%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+139%
65−70
−139%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+92.4%
90−95
−92.4%
Valorant 290−300
+82.2%
160−170
−82.2%
Atomic Heart 160−170
+160%
65−70
−160%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+69.1%
90−95
−69.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+240%
40
−240%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+9%
250−260
−9%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+189%
46
−189%
Dota 2 139
+14.9%
120−130
−14.9%
Far Cry 5 53
−43.4%
76
+43.4%
Fortnite 240−250
+105%
110−120
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+122%
90−95
−122%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+139%
65−70
−139%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
+40.7%
91
−40.7%
Metro Exodus 98
+88.5%
50−55
−88.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+92.4%
90−95
−92.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 307
+237%
91
−237%
Valorant 290−300
+82.2%
160−170
−82.2%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+69.1%
90−95
−69.1%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+196%
45−50
−196%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+241%
39
−241%
Dota 2 131
+8.3%
120−130
−8.3%
Far Cry 5 52
−36.5%
71
+36.5%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+122%
90−95
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+92.4%
90−95
−92.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180
+260%
50
−260%
Valorant 290−300
+82.2%
160−170
−82.2%
Fortnite 240−250
+105%
110−120
−105%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+132%
160−170
−132%
Grand Theft Auto V 96
+140%
40
−140%
Metro Exodus 84
+171%
30−35
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+28.6%
120−130
−28.6%
Valorant 300−350
+65%
200−210
−65%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+213%
21−24
−213%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+180%
60−65
−180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+214%
37
−214%
Fortnite 150−160
+170%
55−60
−170%
Atomic Heart 45−50
+147%
18−20
−147%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+252%
40−45
−252%
Metro Exodus 70
+250%
20−22
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+317%
35−40
−317%
Valorant 300−350
+126%
130−140
−126%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+156%
35−40
−156%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+182%
10−12
−182%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Dota 2 128
+64.1%
75−80
−64.1%
Far Cry 5 50
+85.2%
27−30
−85.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+190%
40−45
−190%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+280%
24−27
−280%
Fortnite 75−80
+204%
24−27
−204%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how RTX A6000 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 123% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 262% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 136% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A6000 is 317% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 60% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is ahead in 59 tests (88%)
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.48 25.13
Recency 5 October 2020 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 60 Watt

RTX A6000 has a 132.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
480 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
752 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX A6000 or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.