Radeon Pro V620 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 136 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.57 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | TU106 | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 (6 years ago) | 4 November 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 26,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 165.6 | 633.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.299 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 128 |
| TMUs | 120 | 288 |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 72 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 1.1 MB |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 128 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 May 2019 | 4 November 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 300 Watt |
RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 275% lower power consumption.
Pro V620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and Radeon Pro V620. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
