RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	134	48
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.70	53.17
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	6144
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	296.6	299.5
Floating-point processing power	9.492 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	192	192
Tensor Cores	384	192
Ray Tracing Cores	48	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	131 −45%	190−200 +45%
1440p	83 −44.6%	120−130 +44.6%
4K	52 −44.2%	75−80 +44.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −42.9%	110−120 +42.9%
Elden Ring	120−130 −44%	180−190 +44%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 −40%	140−150 +40%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −42.9%	110−120 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −45.3%	250−260 +45.3%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −47.7%	130−140 +47.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	113 −41.6%	160−170 +41.6%
Valorant	200 −45%	290−300 +45%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 −40%	140−150 +40%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −42.9%	110−120 +42.9%
Dota 2	33 −36.4%	45−50 +36.4%
Elden Ring	120−130 −44%	180−190 +44%
Far Cry 5	77 −42.9%	110−120 +42.9%
Fortnite	160−170 −48.1%	240−250 +48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −45.3%	250−260 +45.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	110−120 −47.8%	170−180 +47.8%
Metro Exodus	39 −41%	55−60 +41%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −44.3%	280−290 +44.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 −40.8%	100−105 +40.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −42.9%	180−190 +42.9%
Valorant	130 −46.2%	190−200 +46.2%
World of Tanks	270−280 −43.4%	400−450 +43.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 −40%	140−150 +40%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −48.6%	110−120 +48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 −42.9%	110−120 +42.9%
Dota 2	92 −41.3%	130−140 +41.3%
Far Cry 5	90−95 −39.8%	130−140 +39.8%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −45.3%	250−260 +45.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −44.3%	280−290 +44.3%
Valorant	181 −43.6%	260−270 +43.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 −43.9%	95−100 +43.9%
Elden Ring	70−75 −38.9%	100−105 +38.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −43.9%	95−100 +43.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −48.6%	260−270 +48.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 −47.7%	65−70 +47.7%
World of Tanks	230−240 −30.4%	300−310 +30.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −47.1%	100−105 +47.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −46.6%	170−180 +46.6%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −45.6%	150−160 +45.6%
Metro Exodus	80−85 −37.5%	110−120 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −47.5%	90−95 +47.5%
Valorant	129 −47.3%	190−200 +47.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
Dota 2	65−70 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%
Elden Ring	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%
Metro Exodus	37 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −46.6%	170−180 +46.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −46.3%	60−65 +46.3%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Dota 2	65−70 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −44.2%	75−80 +44.2%
Fortnite	50−55 −40%	70−75 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −44.1%	85−90 +44.1%
Valorant	69 −44.9%	100−105 +44.9%

This is how RTX 5000 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 45% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 45% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 44% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.19	53.94
Recency	27 May 2019	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.