GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Quadro RTX 8100 Quadro RTX 8200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000
2018
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
39.74
+96.6%

RTX 4000 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX 4000 RTX 4000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107268
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.13no data
Power efficiency17.3128.17
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1005 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate222.595.04
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 39.74
+96.6%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15331
+96.7%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+89.7%
58
−89.7%
1440p80−85
+90.5%
42
−90.5%
4K50−55
+85.2%
27
−85.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.17no data
1440p11.24no data
4K17.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+0%
61
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+0%
49
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+0%
53
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hitman 3 51
+0%
51
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
+0%
181
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 201
+0%
201
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+0%
32
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hitman 3 50
+0%
50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
+0%
180
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
+0%
75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 183
+0%
183
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+0%
27
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+0%
15
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
+0%
31
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hitman 3 43
+0%
43
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
+0%
64
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+0%
63
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+0%
38
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hitman 3 28
+0%
28
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120
+0%
120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
+0%
20
+0%
Hitman 3 16
+0%
16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how RTX 4000 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 90% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 is 85% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.74 20.21
Recency 13 November 2018 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 4000 has a 96.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W6800X Radeon Pro W6800X
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5600 XT
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Xbox Series X GPU Xbox Series X GPU
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RTX 2080 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RX Vega 7 Radeon RX Vega 7
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Tesla A100 Tesla A100
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
Jetson Nano GPU Jetson Nano GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 483 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1621 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.