NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
Value for money (0-100)
RDNA 1.0
GPU code name
Navi 10
Market segment
Launch date
13 November 2018 (2 years ago)
19 November 2019 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
Price now

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
Core clock speed
1005 MHz
no data
Boost clock
1545 MHz
1930 MHz
Number of transistors
13,600 million
10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
160 Watt
205 Watt
Texture fill rate

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
241 mm
305 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
8 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
13000 MHz
14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
416.0 GB/s
448.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

12 Ultimate (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 58.51 +2.4%
Pro W5700 57.15


This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 15309 +2.4%
Pro W5700 14952

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

2.4% better performance in benchmarks

Lower power consumption (160 vs 205 watts)

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Much newer (19 November 2019 vs 13 November 2018)

Cheaper ($1124 vs $1462)

Higher memory bandwidth (448 vs 416 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 12 nm)

So, Quadro RTX 4000 or Pro W5700?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon Pro W5700. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.