GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	157	190
Place by popularity	not in top-100	50
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.42	27.06
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19E-Q3	TU116
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	29 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$2890	$206

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 SUPER has 265% better value for money than RTX 4000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1280
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	249.6	138.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 32.32
+22.9%

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.30

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 Mobile 12482
+22.9%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10156

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 23% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 25371
+39.3%

GTX 1650 SUPER 18218

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 39% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Mobile 56250

GTX 1650 SUPER 64463
+14.6%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by 15% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 18849
+54.2%

GTX 1650 SUPER 12225

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 54% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Mobile 119052
+73.6%

GTX 1650 SUPER 68578

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 74% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 4000 Mobile 445161

GTX 1650 SUPER 657142
+47.6%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by 48% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	106 +53.6%	69 −53.6%
1440p	64 +88.2%	34 −88.2%
4K	49 +133%	21 −133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	87	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60	no data
Battlefield 5	100−110	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	125	no data
Forza Horizon 4	130−140	no data
Hitman 3	65−70	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	207	no data
Metro Exodus	95−100	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60	no data
Battlefield 5	100−110	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	90	no data
Forza Horizon 4	130−140	no data
Hitman 3	65−70	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130	no data
Metro Exodus	51	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	143	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	54	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60	no data
Far Cry 5	70−75	no data
Forza Horizon 4	130−140	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	121	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24	no data
Far Cry 5	69	no data
Forza Horizon 4	65−70	no data
Hitman 3	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	89	no data
Metro Exodus	77	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	33	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10	no data
Far Cry 5	18−20	no data
Forza Horizon 4	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	50	no data
Metro Exodus	43	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	no data