GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RTX 4000 Max-Q
33.01
+26.1%

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 26% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking151189
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Value for moneyno data27.05
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q3 MAX-QTU116
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)29 October 2019 (4 years old)
Current priceno data$206
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601280
Core clock speed780 - 960 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 - 1485 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 - 90 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8138.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready++
Multi Monitorno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 33.01
+26.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 26.17

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 26% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 12794
+26.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 10143

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 26% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 23574
+29.4%
GTX 1650 SUPER 18218

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 29% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 17049
+39.5%
GTX 1650 SUPER 12225

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 39% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 35167
GTX 1650 SUPER 68578
+95%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q by 95% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
+23.6%
72
−23.6%
1440p46
+27.8%
36
−27.8%
4K48
+118%
22
−118%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−12.5%
63
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+19.6%
50−55
−19.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+9.4%
53
−9.4%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+40.3%
72
−40.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+29%
65−70
−29%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+12%
50
−12%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−9.4%
93
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−7.2%
89
+7.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+20.7%
85−90
−20.7%
Hitman 3 100−110
−1.9%
105
+1.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−4.2%
74
+4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−34%
71
+34%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−10.4%
85
+10.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−14.5%
71
+14.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+19.6%
50−55
−19.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+123%
26
−123%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+74.1%
58
−74.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+29%
65−70
−29%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+40%
40
−40%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−1.2%
86
+1.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+20.7%
85−90
−20.7%
Hitman 3 100−110
+24.1%
83
−24.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+22.4%
58
−22.4%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+13.7%
51
−13.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+76.7%
30
−76.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+14.9%
67
−14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+27.8%
90
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+1.6%
61
−1.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+19.6%
50−55
−19.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+287%
15
−287%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+77.2%
57
−77.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+64.7%
34
−64.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+7.6%
79
−7.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+9.2%
76
−9.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+20.7%
85−90
−20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+26%
50
−26%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+195%
21
−195%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Hitman 3 55−60
+15.7%
51
−15.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+15.4%
39
−15.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+20.7%
29
−20.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+136%
11
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+17.5%
40
−17.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+169%
13
−169%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+71.4%
42
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+20%
20
−20%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+9.3%
54
−9.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+14.5%
55
−14.5%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+27.8%
50−55
−27.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+37.5%
30−35
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+100%
14
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
+28%
25
−28%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+380%
5
−380%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+37.5%
16
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+31.6%
19
−31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+12.5%
32
−12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+300%
5
−300%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+66.7%
24
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3
−233%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+25%
24
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+17.9%
28
−17.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+24.3%
35−40
−24.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+100%
8
−100%

This is how RTX 4000 Max-Q and GTX 1650 SUPER compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 23.6% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 27.8% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER

4K resolution:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 118% faster than GTX 1650 SUPER

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4000 Max-Q is 380% faster than the GTX 1650 SUPER.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 34% faster than the RTX 4000 Max-Q.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is ahead in 58 tests (85%)
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 33.01 26.17
Recency 27 May 2019 29 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 125 Watt

The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 12 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4062 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.