NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
780 - 960 MHz
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, sometimes including their particular versions.
12 Ultimate (12_1)
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
RTX 4000 Max-Q 51.80 +13.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 45.80
RTX 4000 Max-Q 11185 +13.1%
GTX 1650 SUPER 9889
Let's see how good Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
13.1% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (2560 vs 1280)
Higher memory bandwidth (416 vs 192 GB/s)
Less power hungry (80 vs 100 watts)
G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Somewhat newer (22 November 2019 vs 27 May 2019)
So, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q or GTX 1650 SUPER?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q.
Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.