GeForce GTX 1630 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	157	363
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.41	12.86
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N19E-Q3	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$2890	$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1630 has 74% better value for money than RTX 4000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	512
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	249.6	57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Mobile 32.32
+150%

GTX 1630 12.92

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 Mobile 12482
+150%

GTX 1630 4991

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 150% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	106 +165%	40−45 −165%
1440p	64 +167%	24−27 −167%
4K	49 +172%	18−20 −172%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+162%

21−24

−162%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	87 +190%	30−33 −190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +167%	21−24 −167%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +163%	40−45 −163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +175%	24−27 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +167%	27−30 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	125 +178%	45−50 −178%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +162%	50−55 −162%
Hitman 3	65−70 +175%	24−27 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	207 +159%	80−85 −159%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +183%	35−40 −183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +173%	30−33 −173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +164%	45−50 −164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +183%	30−33 −183%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75 +178%	27−30 −178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +167%	21−24 −167%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +163%	40−45 −163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +175%	24−27 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +167%	27−30 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	90 +157%	35−40 −157%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +162%	50−55 −162%
Hitman 3	65−70 +175%	24−27 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +158%	50−55 −158%
Metro Exodus	51 +183%	18−20 −183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +173%	30−33 −173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +164%	45−50 −164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	143 +160%	55−60 −160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +183%	30−33 −183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	54 +157%	21−24 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +167%	21−24 −167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +175%	24−27 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +167%	27−30 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +162%	50−55 −162%
Horizon Zero Dawn	121 +169%	45−50 −169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +164%	45−50 −164%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +178%	27−30 −178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +183%	30−33 −183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+173%

30−33

−173%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +154%	24−27 −154%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +170%	27−30 −170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +156%	16−18 −156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +161%	18−20 −161%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Far Cry 5	69 +156%	27−30 −156%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +175%	24−27 −175%
Hitman 3	40−45 +186%	14−16 −186%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 +154%	35−40 −154%
Metro Exodus	77 +157%	30−33 −157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +178%	27−30 −178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +175%	16−18 −175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+162%

21−24

−162%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	33 +175%	12−14 −175%
Hitman 3	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +179%	14−16 −179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30 +200%	10−11 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +183%	18−20 −183%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 +180%	10−11 −180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +175%	16−18 −175%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50 +178%	18−20 −178%
Metro Exodus	43 +169%	16−18 −169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%