RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Quadro P620

Place in the ranking	469	8
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.40	21.99
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	AD102
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	12800
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1155 MHz
Boost clock speed	1443 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	46.18	1,020
Floating-point processing power	1.478 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	176
TMUs	32	400
Tensor Cores	no data	400
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.51

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 79.71
+738%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3656

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 30636
+738%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 12080

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 139440
+1054%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Quadro P620 10918

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 162637
+1390%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−733%

400−450
+733%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −706%	250−260 +706%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −689%	300−310 +689%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −733%	200−210 +733%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −708%	210−220 +708%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −700%	200−210 +700%
Valorant	35−40 −733%	300−310 +733%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −706%	250−260 +706%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Dota 2	30 −733%	250−260 +733%
Far Cry 5	64 −681%	500−550 +681%
Fortnite	55−60 −704%	450−500 +704%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −689%	300−310 +689%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −733%	200−210 +733%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −724%	280−290 +724%
Metro Exodus	6 −733%	50−55 +733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	125 −700%	1000−1050 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −700%	200−210 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −728%	240−250 +728%
Valorant	35−40 −733%	300−310 +733%
World of Tanks	130−140 −733%	1150−1200 +733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −706%	250−260 +706%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Dota 2	83 −683%	650−700 +683%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −650%	300−310 +650%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −689%	300−310 +689%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −733%	200−210 +733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −711%	600−650 +711%
Valorant	35−40 −733%	300−310 +733%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −669%	100−105 +669%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −661%	350−400 +661%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
World of Tanks	65−70 −709%	550−600 +709%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −706%	250−260 +706%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −710%	170−180 +710%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −686%	110−120 +686%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −724%	140−150 +724%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −669%	100−105 +669%
Valorant	24−27 −733%	200−210 +733%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Dota 2	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −700%	40−45 +700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −721%	230−240 +721%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −713%	65−70 +713%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%
Dota 2	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
Fortnite	10−11 −700%	80−85 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −733%	100−105 +733%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Valorant	9−10 −733%	75−80 +733%

This is how Quadro P620 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 733% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.51	79.71
Recency	1 February 2018	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	250 Watt

Quadro P620 has 525% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 738.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.