Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Quadro P620

Place in the ranking	467	525
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Power efficiency	16.32	18.71
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	80
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1443 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	46.18	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.478 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.43
+24.6%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P620 5909
+10.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P620 25105
+15.5%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P620 4673
+16.5%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 30410
+38.7%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P620 310112
+86.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P620 1388
+17.6%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 1180

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	44 +132%	19 −132%
1440p	12−14 +20%	10 −20%
4K	16−18 +14.3%	14 −14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+7.1%

−7.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −35.7%	19 +35.7%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +31.8%	21−24 −31.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +15.4%	13 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +28.6%	45−50 −28.6%
Hitman 3	18−20 +12.5%	16 −12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +20.9%	40−45 −20.9%
Metro Exodus	35 −8.6%	38 +8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +30%	20−22 −30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55 +120%	24−27 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −1.6%	62 +1.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +31.8%	21−24 −31.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +50%	10 −50%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +28.6%	45−50 −28.6%
Hitman 3	18−20 +20%	15 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +20.9%	40−45 −20.9%
Metro Exodus	28 +3.7%	27 −3.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +30%	20−22 −30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +29.2%	24 −29.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +18.2%	21−24 −18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +24.5%	49 −24.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +87.5%	8 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +28.6%	45−50 −28.6%
Hitman 3	18−20 +50%	12 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +225%	16 −225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +55%	20 −55%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +54.5%	11 −54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +10.9%	55−60 −10.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+30%

20−22

−30%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +51.9%	27−30 −51.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −45.5%	16 +45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +27.7%	45−50 −27.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+23.1%

12−14

−23.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Hitman 3	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +56%	24−27 −56%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+28.6%

7−8

−28.6%

This is how Quadro P620 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 132% faster in 1080p
Quadro P620 is 20% faster in 1440p
Quadro P620 is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P620 is 225% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 45% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 65 tests (90%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 6 tests (8%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.43	7.57
Recency	1 February 2018	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	28 Watt

Quadro P620 has a 24.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.