Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro P2000

Place in the ranking	298	291
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.52	no data
Power efficiency	17.38	74.60
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP106	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$585	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1024
Core clock speed	1076 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	94.72	91.20
Floating-point processing power	3.031 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	32
TMUs	64	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.91

T1200 Mobile 19.48
+3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P2000 8387

T1200 Mobile 14387
+71.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P2000 32964

T1200 Mobile 44135
+33.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P2000 6847

T1200 Mobile 10134
+48%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 43566

T1200 Mobile 50827
+16.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 +0%	58 +0%
1440p	20 −65%	33 +65%
4K	17 −376%	81 +376%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	10.09	no data
1440p	29.25	no data
4K	34.41	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −3.3%	60−65 +3.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +124%	17 −124%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −3.8%	80−85 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −4%	50−55 +4%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +2%	50−55 −2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Valorant	75−80 −3.9%	75−80 +3.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −3.3%	60−65 +3.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +171%	14 −171%
Dota 2	34 −235%	114 +235%
Far Cry 5	72 +22%	59 −22%
Fortnite	100−110 −3%	100−110 +3%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −3.8%	80−85 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −4%	50−55 +4%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 −6%	71 +6%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −3.9%	50−55 +3.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	137 +3.8%	130−140 −3.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −20.3%	71 +20.3%
Valorant	75−80 −3.9%	75−80 +3.9%
World of Tanks	220−230 −1.8%	220−230 +1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −3.3%	60−65 +3.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +245%	11 −245%
Dota 2	98 −9.2%	107 +9.2%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +16.1%	56 −16.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −3.8%	80−85 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40 −230%	130−140 +230%
Valorant	75−80 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 −23.3%	37 +23.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −1.2%	170−180 +1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
World of Tanks	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +114%	7 −114%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +22%	41 −22%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Valorant	45−50 +6.7%	45−50 −6.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Dota 2	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −3.1%	30−35 +3.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	39 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −3.1%	30−35 +3.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 −241%	109 +241%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −4.2%	24−27 +4.2%
Fortnite	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Valorant	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5	65 +0%	65 +0%
Fortnite	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt

+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

100−110

+0%

100−110

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

50−55

+0%

50−55

+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

55−60

+0%

55−60

+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how Quadro P2000 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 65% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 376% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 245% faster.
in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 241% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P2000 is ahead in 8 tests (15%)
T1200 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (54%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.91	19.48
Recency	6 February 2017	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	18 Watt

Quadro P2000 has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 and Quadro T1200 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.