Quadro T1200 Mobile vs P2200

Place in performance ranking	211	259
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	33.50	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP106	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	10 June 2019 (5 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$409	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1024
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	119.4	91.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P2200 and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10008 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	70−75 +20.7%	58 −20.7%
1440p	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
4K	95−100 +17.3%	81 −17.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+33.3%

24−27

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	65 +30%	50−55 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +21.3%	75−80 −21.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +22.2%	45−50 −22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +35%	40−45 −35%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +21.3%	75−80 −21.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +22.2%	45−50 −22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	44 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	71 +29.1%	55−60 −29.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	47 +34.3%	35−40 −34.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	56 +24.4%	45−50 −24.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +21.3%	75−80 −21.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Hitman 3	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +23.3%	30−33 −23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +33.3%	30−33 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Hitman 3	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Battlefield 5	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

This is how Quadro P2200 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P2200 is 21% faster in 1080p
Quadro P2200 is 6% faster in 1440p
Quadro P2200 is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.16	19.96
Recency	10 June 2019	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	95 Watt