Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P600

Place in the ranking	500	205
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.71	no data
Power efficiency	14.87	53.94
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP107	AD107
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$178	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	1430 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	38.88	129.6
Floating-point processing power	1.244 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	24	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1252 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.62

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.36
+217%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P600 4655

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+335%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P600 4083

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+246%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P600 1162

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+354%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−206%

110−120
+206%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.94

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Elden Ring	24−27 −213%	75−80 +213%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −204%	85−90 +204%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −194%	100−105 +194%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −204%	70−75 +204%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −213%	75−80 +213%
Valorant	30−35 −206%	95−100 +206%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −204%	85−90 +204%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Dota 2	27 −215%	85−90 +215%
Elden Ring	24−27 −213%	75−80 +213%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −197%	110−120 +197%
Fortnite	50−55 −214%	160−170 +214%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −194%	100−105 +194%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 −217%	95−100 +217%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −204%	70−75 +204%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95 −216%	300−310 +216%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −213%	75−80 +213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −208%	80−85 +208%
Valorant	30−35 −206%	95−100 +206%
World of Tanks	120−130 −213%	400−450 +213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −204%	85−90 +204%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Dota 2	72 −206%	220−230 +206%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −197%	110−120 +197%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −194%	100−105 +194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −209%	210−220 +209%
Valorant	30−35 −206%	95−100 +206%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Elden Ring	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −210%	130−140 +210%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
World of Tanks	60−65 −206%	190−200 +206%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −213%	50−55 +213%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −206%	55−60 +206%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −200%	45−50 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Valorant	21−24 −195%	65−70 +195%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Dota 2	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%
Elden Ring	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −200%	75−80 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Dota 2	18−20 −216%	60−65 +216%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Fortnite	9−10 −200%	27−30 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −200%	30−33 +200%
Valorant	8−9 −200%	24−27 +200%

This is how Quadro P600 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 206% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.62	27.36
Recency	7 February 2017	26 February 2024
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 217.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.