Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	321	202
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	15.45	53.48
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP104	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2048
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	129.6
Floating-point processing power	3.11 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	80	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.89

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.29
+61.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P3000 Mobile 12105

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+67.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P3000 Mobile 33390

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+98.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P3000 Mobile 9256

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+52.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P3000 Mobile 2864

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 5278
+84.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	64 −56.3%	100−110 +56.3%
4K	28 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−61.3%

50−55
+61.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −58.7%	100−105 +58.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −55.6%	70−75 +55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −53.8%	80−85 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −58.3%	190−200 +58.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −59.6%	150−160 +59.6%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −53.8%	80−85 +53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −55.6%	140−150 +55.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −58.7%	100−105 +58.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −55.6%	70−75 +55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −53.8%	80−85 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −58.3%	190−200 +58.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −59.6%	150−160 +59.6%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −53.8%	80−85 +53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	81 −60.5%	130−140 +60.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −55.6%	140−150 +55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −55.6%	70−75 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −58.3%	190−200 +58.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −59.6%	150−160 +59.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −55.6%	140−150 +55.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−53.8%

80−85
+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −58.9%	170−180 +58.9%
Hitman 3	21−24 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −52.8%	55−60 +52.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −56.5%	180−190 +56.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−56.3%

50−55
+56.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Hitman 3	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −60%	160−170 +60%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −59.1%	35−40 +59.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−58.8%

27−30
+58.8%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 56% faster in 1080p
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 61% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.89	27.29
Recency	11 January 2017	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 61.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.