GeForce MX330 vs Quadro P600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with GeForce MX330, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.43
+37.1%

P600 outperforms MX330 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking507587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.58no data
Power efficiency14.8043.19
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP107GP108
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)10 February 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1430 MHz1531 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1594 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8838.26
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS1.224 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P600 8.43
+37.1%
GeForce MX330 6.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3317
+37%
GeForce MX330 2422

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P600 4655
GeForce MX330 4834
+3.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P600 4083
+8.5%
GeForce MX330 3762

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P600 28957
+39.7%
GeForce MX330 20729

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P600 10597
GeForce MX330 10707
+1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P600 243785
+0%
GeForce MX330 243721

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P600 9751
GeForce MX330 10022
+2.8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P600 1162
+0.2%
GeForce MX330 1160

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P600 10634
+7.3%
GeForce MX330 9906

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+56.5%
23
−56.5%
4K30−35
+30.4%
23
−30.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94no data
4K5.93no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+20.7%
29
−20.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+13%
23
−13%
Fortnite 45−50
−28.6%
63
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+16.1%
31
−16.1%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Valorant 80−85
−43.9%
118
+43.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+52.2%
23
−52.2%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+29.6%
95−100
−29.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Dota 2 81
+15.7%
70
−15.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+73.3%
15
−73.3%
Fortnite 45−50
+44.1%
34
−44.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+63.6%
22
−63.6%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+45.5%
11
−45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+31.6%
19
−31.6%
Valorant 80−85
−29.3%
106
+29.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+84.2%
19
−84.2%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Dota 2 72
+12.5%
64
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+85.7%
14
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+125%
16
−125%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+16.7%
12
−16.7%
Valorant 80−85
+20.6%
65−70
−20.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+133%
21
−133%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+13.5%
35−40
−13.5%
Valorant 90−95
+35.8%
65−70
−35.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 27−30
+20.8%
24
−20.8%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Quadro P600 and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 57% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P600 is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P600 is 200% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX330 is 44% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is ahead in 63 tests (94%)
  • GeForce MX330 is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.43 6.15
Recency 7 February 2017 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 10 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 37.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX330, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation card while GeForce MX330 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GeForce MX330

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 218 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2240 votes

Rate GeForce MX330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P600 or GeForce MX330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.