Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Quadro P5200

Place in performance ranking	163	114
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.41	71.09
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Vega 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$3894	$366

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 64X has 1985% better value for money than Quadro P5200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4096
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1468 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	279.4	375.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.4 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.125
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.78

Pro Vega 64X 37.84
+19.1%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Quadro P5200 by 19% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P5200 12286

Pro Vega 64X 14630
+19.1%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Quadro P5200 by 19% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P5200 41715

Pro Vega 64X 75438
+80.8%

Radeon Pro Vega 64X outperforms Quadro P5200 by 81% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	124 −12.9%	140−150 +12.9%
4K	58 −12.1%	65−70 +12.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55

−11.1%

60−65
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −18.2%	65−70 +18.2%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −14.5%	95−100 +14.5%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −12.2%	110−120 +12.2%
Hitman 3	75−80 −13.9%	90−95 +13.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −14%	130−140 +14%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −17.3%	95−100 +17.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −18.2%	65−70 +18.2%
Battlefield 5	100−110 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −14.5%	95−100 +14.5%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −12.2%	110−120 +12.2%
Hitman 3	75−80 −13.9%	90−95 +13.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −14%	130−140 +14%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −17.3%	95−100 +17.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118 −18.6%	140−150 +18.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −18.2%	65−70 +18.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 −12.2%	110−120 +12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −14%	130−140 +14%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −14.9%	100−105 +14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

−17.3%

95−100
+17.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −18.1%	85−90 +18.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −8%	27−30 +8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −16.1%	65−70 +16.1%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −15.4%	75−80 +15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −11.9%	75−80 +11.9%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −14.9%	85−90 +14.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −19%	50−55 +19%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	50−55 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Hitman 3	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −7.1%	30−33 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%