UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2200 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Quadro P6000
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.52
+888%

P5000 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by a whopping 888% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking166737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.21no data
Power efficiency12.49no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGP104Rocket Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204832
Core clock speed1607 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate277.3no data
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1127 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD98
+416%
19
−416%
1440p200−210
+852%
21
−852%
4K42
+367%
9
−367%

Cost per frame, $

1080p25.50no data
1440p12.50no data
4K59.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1100%
6−7
−1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+975%
16−18
−975%
Hitman 3 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+120%
64
−120%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+1043%
7−8
−1043%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+777%
12−14
−777%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+203%
35−40
−203%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1100%
6−7
−1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+975%
16−18
−975%
Hitman 3 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+176%
51
−176%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+2600%
4−5
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+1043%
7−8
−1043%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+850%
12
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+203%
35−40
−203%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+843%
7−8
−843%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1100%
6−7
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+975%
16−18
−975%
Hitman 3 65−70
+750%
8−9
−750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+513%
21−24
−513%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+777%
13
−777%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+279%
14−16
−279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+203%
35−40
−203%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+1043%
7−8
−1043%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+1120%
5−6
−1120%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+933%
18−20
−933%
Hitman 3 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+763%
8−9
−763%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+917%
6−7
−917%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+971%
7−8
−971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+844%
18−20
−844%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+817%
6−7
−817%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Hitman 3 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+894%
16−18
−894%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%

This is how Quadro P5000 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 416% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 852% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P5000 is 367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.52 3.29
Recency 1 October 2016 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm

Quadro P5000 has a 888.4% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
vs
Iris Graphics 540 Iris Graphics 540
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
PRO WX 9100 Radeon PRO WX 9100
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
HD 8180 Radeon HD 8180
vs
ATI Rage 4 PRO Rage 4 PRO
HD 8180 Radeon HD 8180
vs
ATI Rage Mobility-M4 Rage Mobility-M4
HD 6310 Radeon HD 6310
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
vs
FX Go 5200 GeForce FX Go 5200
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
Pro 555 Radeon Pro 555
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
vs
FX 4400 Quadro FX 4400
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
vs
NX-SoC NX SoC
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
vs
R6 Mobile Graphics Radeon R6 Mobile Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 177 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.