GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.25

GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile outperforms Quadro P5000 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking15988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.37no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGP104GN20-E7 GA104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data
Current price$1270 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed1607 MHz780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1245 - 1710 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate277.3296.6
Floating-point performance8,873 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5000 and GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed9016 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.18.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
−35.2%
119
+35.2%
1440p60−65
−28.3%
77
+28.3%
4K41
−17.1%
48
+17.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 95−100 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Metro Exodus 95−100 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

This is how Quadro P5000 and RTX 3080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 35% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 28% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 Mobile is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.25 41.26
Recency 1 October 2016 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 140 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 758 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.