GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P5000

Place in performance ranking	159	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	63
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.37	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	GN20-P1
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)	10 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	no data
Current price	$1270 (0.5x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2560
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1222 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	277.3	118.8
Floating-point performance	8,873 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5000 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	9016 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	88 +18.9%	74 −18.9%
1440p	55−60 +27.9%	43 −27.9%
4K	41 +57.7%	26 −57.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60

−12.7%

62
+12.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +22.9%	45−50 −22.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −7.1%	60 +7.1%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +28%	80−85 −28%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +29.4%	50−55 −29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −7.3%	59 +7.3%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +24.1%	55−60 −24.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +26.2%	65−70 −26.2%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +21.3%	100−110 −21.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 −21.2%	80 +21.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −11.6%	144 +11.6%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −44.4%	143 +44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −19.5%	98 +19.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −7.6%	128 +7.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +44.1%	59 −44.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +22.9%	45−50 −22.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +60%	35 −60%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +28%	80−85 −28%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +29.4%	50−55 −29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +22.2%	45 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +24.1%	55−60 −24.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +26.2%	65−70 −26.2%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +21.3%	100−110 −21.3%
Hitman 3	65−70 +1.5%	65 −1.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +30.3%	95−100 −30.3%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +4.2%	95 −4.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 −9.8%	90 +9.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +13.3%	105 −13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 +6.5%	92 −6.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −139%	203 +139%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +22.9%	45−50 −22.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +115%	26 −115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +29.4%	50−55 −29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +37.5%	40 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +24.1%	55−60 −24.1%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +21.3%	100−110 −21.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +40.2%	92 −40.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +32.2%	90 −32.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	53 +6%	50 −6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +204%	28 −204%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+1.2%

−1.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +27.1%	45−50 −27.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 −9.6%	80 +9.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +30.8%	24−27 −30.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +30.8%	26 −30.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +67.9%	28 −67.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +4.5%	22 −4.5%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +14%	50 −14%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Hitman 3	40−45 −15%	46 +15%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −1.5%	69 +1.5%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +1.7%	60 −1.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +23%	61 −23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +41.9%	30−35 −41.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +30%	20 −30%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

−1.8%

56
+1.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +28%	24−27 −28%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +30%	20−22 −30%
Hitman 3	24−27 +30%	20 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +34.5%	27−30 −34.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +26.3%	19 −26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 +24.1%	29 −24.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +29.4%	30−35 −29.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +14.7%	34 −14.7%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +14.3%	28 −14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +50%	10 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−3.6%

29
+3.6%

This is how Quadro P5000 and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P5000 is 19% faster in 1080p
Quadro P5000 is 28% faster in 1440p
Quadro P5000 is 58% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 204% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 139% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P5000 is ahead in 56 tests (78%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 16 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.25	25.04
Recency	1 October 2016	10 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	60 Watt