Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Quadro P4200

Place in performance ranking	211	691
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 May 2018 (6 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	48
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	237.2	no data
Floating-point performance	7.589 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	7132 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

110−120
+511%

−511%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+486%

7−8

−486%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +400%	11 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +811%	9−10 −811%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +467%	9 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +486%	7−8 −486%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +625%	8−9 −625%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +500%	10−12 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +508%	24−27 −508%
Hitman 3	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +330%	27−30 −330%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +353%	19 −353%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +550%	10 −550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +467%	14−16 −467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +140%	40−45 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +811%	9−10 −811%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +486%	7−8 −486%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +625%	8−9 −625%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +500%	10−12 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +508%	24−27 −508%
Hitman 3	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +330%	27−30 −330%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +514%	14 −514%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +550%	10−11 −550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +467%	14−16 −467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +238%	16−18 −238%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +140%	40−45 −140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +400%	10−12 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +486%	7−8 −486%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +625%	8−9 −625%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +508%	24−27 −508%
Hitman 3	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +330%	27−30 −330%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +467%	14−16 −467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +671%	7 −671%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +140%	40−45 −140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+550%

10−11

−550%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +586%	7−8 −586%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +867%	3−4 −867%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +2780%	5−6 −2780%
Hitman 3	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +478%	9−10 −478%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +586%	7−8 −586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +588%	8−9 −588%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +933%	3−4 −933%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +468%	24−27 −468%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+425%

8−9

−425%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +1150%	2−3 −1150%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Hitman 3	20−22	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +617%	18−20 −617%
Metro Exodus	27−30	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +1600%	2−3 −1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+340%

5−6

−340%

This is how Quadro P4200 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compete in popular games:

Quadro P4200 is 511% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 2780% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.14	4.00
Recency	7 May 2018	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	16 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	12 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 528.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 858.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.