T1000 8 GB vs Quadro P4000

Place in performance ranking	171	265
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.91	6.69
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	no data
Current price	$485 (0.6x MSRP)	$690

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4000 has 287% better value for money than T1000 8 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	896
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	165.8	78.12
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4000 30.17
+53.1%

T1000 8 GB 19.71

Quadro P4000 outperforms T1000 8 GB by 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4000 11654
+53.1%

T1000 8 GB 7611

Quadro P4000 outperforms T1000 8 GB by 53% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

68
+70%

40−45

−70%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+70%

30−33

−70%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +63.3%	60−65 −63.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +55%	40−45 −55%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +70%	30−33 −70%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +70%	40−45 −70%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +54%	50−55 −54%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +56.3%	80−85 −56.3%
Hitman 3	60−65 +55%	40−45 −55%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +60%	75−80 −60%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +56.7%	60−65 −56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +56%	50−55 −56%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +55.7%	70−75 −55.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +62%	50−55 −62%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +63.3%	60−65 −63.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +55%	40−45 −55%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +70%	30−33 −70%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +70%	40−45 −70%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +54%	50−55 −54%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +56.3%	80−85 −56.3%
Hitman 3	60−65 +55%	40−45 −55%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +60%	75−80 −60%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +56.7%	60−65 −56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +56%	50−55 −56%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +55.7%	70−75 −55.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77 +54%	50−55 −54%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +62%	50−55 −62%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +73.3%	30−33 −73.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +55%	40−45 −55%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +70%	30−33 −70%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +70%	40−45 −70%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +56.3%	80−85 −56.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +60%	75−80 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +55.7%	70−75 −55.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	41 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +62%	50−55 −62%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+56%

50−55

−56%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +67.5%	40−45 −67.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +59.3%	27−30 −59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +76.7%	30−33 −76.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+70%

30−33

−70%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Hitman 3	24−27 +71.4%	14−16 −71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +71.4%	21−24 −71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +58.3%	12−14 −58.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +71.4%	21−24 −71.4%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%