T1000 8 GB vs Quadro P5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 and T1000 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.10
+65.2%

P5000 outperforms T1000 8 GB by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking170286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.84no data
Power efficiency12.5227.29
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048896
Core clock speed1607 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate277.378.12
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5000 32.10
+65.2%
T1000 8 GB 19.43

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12631
+65.2%
T1000 8 GB 7644

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%
4K41
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Atomic Heart 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+66.7%
60−65
−66.7%
Fortnite 140−150
+75%
80−85
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+71.4%
70−75
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+78%
50−55
−78%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+74.3%
70−75
−74.3%
Valorant 190−200
+75.5%
110−120
−75.5%
Atomic Heart 85−90
+76%
50−55
−76%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+71.9%
160−170
−71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Dota 2 130−140
+68.8%
80−85
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+66.7%
60−65
−66.7%
Fortnite 140−150
+75%
80−85
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+71.4%
70−75
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+78%
50−55
−78%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+78.3%
60−65
−78.3%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+75%
40−45
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+74.3%
70−75
−74.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+78.2%
55−60
−78.2%
Valorant 190−200
+75.5%
110−120
−75.5%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+85.7%
35−40
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Dota 2 130−140
+68.8%
80−85
−68.8%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+66.7%
60−65
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+71.4%
70−75
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+78%
50−55
−78%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+74.3%
70−75
−74.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+76.7%
30−33
−76.7%
Valorant 190−200
+75.5%
110−120
−75.5%
Fortnite 140−150
+75%
80−85
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+75.8%
120−130
−75.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Valorant 230−240
+76.9%
130−140
−76.9%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+82.2%
45−50
−82.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+80%
40−45
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+66%
50−55
−66%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+80%
30−33
−80%
Fortnite 75−80
+71.1%
45−50
−71.1%
Atomic Heart 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+74.3%
35−40
−74.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Valorant 180−190
+67.3%
110−120
−67.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Dota 2 90−95
+70.9%
55−60
−70.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+83.3%
30−33
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Fortnite 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%

This is how Quadro P5000 and T1000 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 69% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.10 19.43
Recency 1 October 2016 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 65.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1000 8 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the T1000 8 GB in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
T1000 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
182 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4
34 votes

Rate T1000 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or T1000 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.