Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro P4000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 and Quadro RTX 8000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P4000
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.96

RTX 8000 outperforms P4000 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19660
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.812.09
Power efficiency19.6913.52
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Quadro P4000 has 752% better value for money than RTX 8000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924608
Core clock speed1202 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate165.8509.8
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs112288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4000 29.96
RTX 8000 50.95
+70.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4000 11584
RTX 8000 19701
+70.1%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P4000 41351
RTX 8000 147323
+256%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P4000 41749
RTX 8000 122427
+193%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P4000 38590
RTX 8000 144049
+273%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.99
+658%
90.90
−658%
  • Quadro P4000 has 658% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−68.2%
180−190
+68.2%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−63%
150−160
+63%
Fortnite 130−140
−66.7%
220−230
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−62.2%
180−190
+62.2%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−60.5%
130−140
+60.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−69.6%
190−200
+69.6%
Valorant 180−190
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−68.2%
180−190
+68.2%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−66.7%
450−500
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Dota 2 130−140
−67.9%
220−230
+67.9%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−63%
150−160
+63%
Fortnite 130−140
−66.7%
220−230
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−62.2%
180−190
+62.2%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−60.5%
130−140
+60.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
−70%
170−180
+70%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−69.6%
190−200
+69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
−68.8%
130−140
+68.8%
Valorant 180−190
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−68.2%
180−190
+68.2%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Dota 2 130−140
−67.9%
220−230
+67.9%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−63%
150−160
+63%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−62.2%
180−190
+62.2%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
−60.5%
130−140
+60.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−69.6%
190−200
+69.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Valorant 180−190
−64.8%
300−310
+64.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−66.7%
220−230
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−53.8%
300−310
+53.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−69.8%
90−95
+69.8%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−65.7%
290−300
+65.7%
Valorant 220−230
−58.4%
350−400
+58.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−68.8%
130−140
+68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−60%
120−130
+60%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
Valorant 160−170
−66.7%
280−290
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Dota 2 85−90
−68.5%
150−160
+68.5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−70%
85−90
+70%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%

This is how Quadro P4000 and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 62% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.96 50.95
Recency 6 February 2017 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 260 Watt

Quadro P4000 has 160% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 70.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 312 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 or Quadro RTX 8000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.