Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro P3200

Place in the ranking	245	285
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	21.12	75.03
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP104	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	1024
Core clock speed	1328 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	1543 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	172.8	91.20
Floating-point processing power	5.53 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.79
+17.3%

T1200 Mobile 19.43

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P3200 16619
+15.5%

T1200 Mobile 14387

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P3200 45999
+4.2%

T1200 Mobile 44135

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
+23.9%

T1200 Mobile 10134

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 82507
+62.3%

T1200 Mobile 50827

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	84 +44.8%	58 −44.8%
1440p	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
4K	28 −189%	81 +189%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+15.6%

30−35

−15.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 +47.7%	40−45 −47.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −20.5%	47 +20.5%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +15.4%	65−70 −15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +15.6%	30−35 −15.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −22.6%	65 +22.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +11.4%	120−130 −11.4%
Hitman 3	45−50 +17.9%	35−40 −17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +78.3%	60 −78.3%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +21.5%	65−70 −21.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	129 +119%	59 −119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +83.3%	54 −83.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	88 +100%	40−45 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +39.3%	28 −39.3%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +15.4%	65−70 −15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +15.6%	30−35 −15.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −11.3%	59 +11.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +11.4%	120−130 −11.4%
Hitman 3	45−50 +17.9%	35−40 −17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +128%	47 −128%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +14.5%	65−70 −14.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +13.2%	50−55 −13.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +75%	44 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −42%	71 +42%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +111%	47 −111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 −10%	40−45 +10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +85.7%	21 −85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +15.6%	30−35 −15.6%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −5.7%	56 +5.7%
Forza Horizon 4	72 −70.8%	120−130 +70.8%
Hitman 3	45−50 +31.4%	35−40 −31.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +18.9%	90−95 −18.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +18.5%	65−70 −18.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +24.3%	37 −24.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +421%	19 −421%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+20%

50−55

−20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +25.7%	35−40 −25.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +20%	20−22 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +22.2%	18 −22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −57.7%	41 +57.7%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +17.1%	110−120 −17.1%
Hitman 3	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +22.5%	40−45 −22.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +1000%	12 −1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+26.7%

30−33

−26.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Hitman 3	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +14.6%	100−110 −14.6%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +40%	20−22 −40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+25%

16−18

−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how Quadro P3200 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro P3200 is 45% faster in 1080p
Quadro P3200 is 6% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 189% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 1000% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 71% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P3200 is ahead in 44 tests (65%)
T1200 Mobile is ahead in 8 tests (12%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	22.79	19.43
Recency	21 February 2018	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	18 Watt