Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.62
+68.1%

P5200 Max-Q outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking173298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.4074.06
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1316 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate251.091.20
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+63.8%
58
−63.8%
1440p55−60
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
4K130−140
+60.5%
81
−60.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P5200 Max-Q is 64% faster in 1080p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 67% faster in 1440p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 60% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.62 19.41
Recency 21 February 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 18 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 68.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
vs
R4 Graphics R4 Graphics
RTX 2070 Super 2070 Super
vs
GTX 1660 Max-Q 1660 Max-Q
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
vs
RX 550 RX 550
HD Graphics (Haswell) HD Graphics (Haswell)
vs
GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1050 Ti
GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1650 TU116
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
vs
Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 5100
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 610
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GTX 1060 3 GB
RTX A500 RTX A500
vs
GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1070 Ti
L40S L40S
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060
TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
vs
GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1070 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 Max-Q or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.