GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro P3200

Place in performance ranking	223	365
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.66	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N18E-Q1	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 February 2017 (7 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$2122	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	768
Core clock speed	708 - 1202 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	1228 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	78 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	172.8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P3200 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	3 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.3 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	no data
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 23.09
+80.2%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.81

Quadro P3200 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P3200 12555
+96.1%

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401

Quadro P3200 outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 96% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	83 +84.4%	45−50 −84.4%
4K	28 +100%	14−16 −100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+106%

18−20

−106%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 +85.7%	35−40 −85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +90%	40−45 −90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +106%	18−20 −106%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +96.3%	27−30 −96.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	95 +90%	50−55 −90%
Hitman 3	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +82%	50−55 −82%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +90%	40−45 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +107%	30−33 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +95%	40−45 −95%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +90%	40−45 −90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +106%	18−20 −106%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +96.3%	27−30 −96.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +103%	30−33 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +85.5%	55−60 −85.5%
Hitman 3	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +82%	50−55 −82%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +90%	40−45 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +107%	30−33 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +95%	40−45 −95%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	84 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +106%	18−20 −106%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +96.3%	27−30 −96.3%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +106%	35−40 −106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +82%	50−55 −82%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +95%	40−45 −95%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+107%

30−33

−107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +83.3%	24−27 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +100%	24−27 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +85.7%	21−24 −85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Hitman 3	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +95.8%	24−27 −95.8%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +83.3%	24−27 −83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +85.2%	27−30 −85.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+81%

21−24

−81%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Hitman 3	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +100%	14−16 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +100%	16−18 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%