Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 Max-Q and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

P4000 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
19.71
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
23.50
+19.2%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms P4000 Max-Q by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking257213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.6853.40
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed1114 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate137.5129.6
Floating-point processing power4.401 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P4000 Max-Q 19.71
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 23.50
+19.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P4000 Max-Q 15837
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+27.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P4000 Max-Q 12312
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+14.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
4K33
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Fortnite 110−120
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Valorant 150−160
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
−12.1%
65−70
+12.1%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−18.9%
290−300
+18.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Dota 2 110−120
−13%
130−140
+13%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Fortnite 110−120
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Valorant 150−160
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−14.9%
100−105
+14.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Dota 2 110−120
−13%
130−140
+13%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Valorant 150−160
−16.9%
180−190
+16.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−17.6%
180−190
+17.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−15.6%
200−210
+15.6%
Valorant 190−200
−14.6%
220−230
+14.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−16.7%
70−75
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Valorant 120−130
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%

This is how P4000 Max-Q and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 15% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.71 23.50
Recency 11 January 2017 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

P4000 Max-Q has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 Max-Q or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.