Quadro K4200 vs P3000 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	271	389
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.02	4.65
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	N17E-Q1	GK104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$854.99
Current price	$537	$311 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P3000 Mobile has 115% better value for money than Quadro K4200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1344
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	784 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	87.81
Floating-point performance	3,110 gflops	2,107 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P3000 Mobile and Quadro K4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	6.1	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 +80%	35−40 −80%
4K	28 +75%	16−18 −75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+61.3%

30−35

−61.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +58.7%	60−65 −58.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +66.7%	45−50 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +63.5%	50−55 −63.5%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +70.5%	85−90 −70.5%
Hitman 3	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +71.1%	75−80 −71.1%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +71.9%	60−65 −71.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +69.8%	50−55 −69.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +58.7%	60−65 −58.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +69.5%	55−60 −69.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +58.7%	60−65 −58.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +66.7%	45−50 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	85−90 +63.5%	50−55 −63.5%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +70.5%	85−90 −70.5%
Hitman 3	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +71.1%	75−80 −71.1%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +71.9%	60−65 −71.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +69.8%	50−55 −69.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +58.7%	60−65 −58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +58.7%	63 −58.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +69.5%	55−60 −69.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +61.3%	30−35 −61.3%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +66.7%	45−50 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +70.5%	85−90 −70.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +71.1%	75−80 −71.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +58.7%	60−65 −58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +66.7%	33 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +69.5%	55−60 −69.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
+69.8%

50−55

−69.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +62.2%	35−40 −62.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +60%	24−27 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +71.1%	35−40 −71.1%
Hitman 3	35−40 +52.2%	21−24 −52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +59.1%	21−24 −59.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+71.9%

30−35

−71.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +57.9%	18−20 −57.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Hitman 3	24−27 +60%	14−16 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +61.5%	12−14 −61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +59.1%	22 −59.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +60%	10−11 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+58.8%

16−18

−58.8%

This is how P3000 Mobile and Quadro K4200 compete in popular games:

P3000 Mobile is 80% faster in 1080p
P3000 Mobile is 75% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.33	11.19
Recency	11 January 2017	22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt