Radeon Pro W6800 vs Quadro P2200

Place in performance ranking	211	48
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	33.50	20.30
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP106	Navi 21
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 June 2019 (5 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,249
Current price	$409	$1990 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2200 has 65% better value for money than Pro W6800.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	3840
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	2075 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	2320 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	119.4	556.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	201 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10008 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2200 24.16

Pro W6800 51.24
+112%

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms Quadro P2200 by 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P2200 9332

Pro W6800 19787
+112%

Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms Quadro P2200 by 112% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65−70 −122%	144 +122%
1440p	55−60 −127%	125 +127%
4K	40−45 −115%	86 +115%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

95−100
−111%

200−210

+111%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −112%	180−190 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 −105%	180−190 +105%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −84%	300−310 +84%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 −110%	210−220 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −111%	200−210 +111%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −106%	210−220 +106%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −110%	260−270 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −97.7%	350−400 +97.7%
Hitman 3	100−110 −104%	210−220 +104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	283 −112%	600−650 +112%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −109%	270−280 +109%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −107%	230−240 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	282 −95%	550−600 +95%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −111%	240−250 +111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −112%	180−190 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 −105%	180−190 +105%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −84%	300−310 +84%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 −110%	210−220 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −111%	200−210 +111%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −106%	210−220 +106%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −110%	260−270 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −97.7%	350−400 +97.7%
Hitman 3	100−110 −104%	210−220 +104%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 −88.7%	400−450 +88.7%
Metro Exodus	30 −100%	60−65 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −107%	230−240 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	277 −98.6%	550−600 +98.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	199 −101%	400−450 +101%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −111%	240−250 +111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −112%	180−190 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 −105%	180−190 +105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 −110%	210−220 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	95−100 −111%	200−210 +111%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −106%	210−220 +106%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −97.7%	350−400 +97.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	225 −100%	450−500 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	268 −105%	550−600 +105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	157 −91.1%	300−310 +91.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −111%	240−250 +111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−107%

230−240
+107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −110%	220−230 +110%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −108%	250−260 +108%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −111%	120−130 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −100%	120−130 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −110%	170−180 +110%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −102%	95−100 +102%
Far Cry 5	64 −103%	130−140 +103%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −104%	230−240 +104%
Hitman 3	70−75 −111%	150−160 +111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	179 −95.5%	350−400 +95.5%
Metro Exodus	55 −100%	110−120 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	212 −88.7%	400−450 +88.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −105%	170−180 +105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −96.1%	100−105 +96.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

85−90
−105%

180−190

+105%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −100%	110−120 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −107%	95−100 +107%
Hitman 3	40−45 −109%	90−95 +109%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −100%	140−150 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −105%	90−95 +105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	99 −102%	200−210 +102%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −111%	80−85 +111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −100%	70−75 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −100%	70−75 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −103%	65−70 +103%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −100%	150−160 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	109 −111%	230−240 +111%
Metro Exodus	55 −100%	110−120 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
−108%

100−105

+108%

This is how Quadro P2200 and Pro W6800 compete in popular games:

Pro W6800 is 122% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800 is 127% faster in 1440p
Pro W6800 is 115% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.16	51.24
Recency	10 June 2019	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt