Radeon Pro W5500 vs Quadro P2200

Place in performance ranking	210	215
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	32.18	46.11
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP106	Navi 14
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	10 June 2019 (4 years old)	10 February 2020 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$409	$308 (0.8x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W5500 has 43% better value for money than Quadro P2200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1408
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	125 Watt
Texture fill rate	119.4	123.2

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	201 mm	267 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10008 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	224.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2200 24.07
+1.9%

Pro W5500 23.61

Quadro P2200 outperforms Radeon Pro W5500 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P2200 9322
+1.9%

Pro W5500 9146

Quadro P2200 outperforms Radeon Pro W5500 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	24.07	23.61
Recency	10 June 2019	10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	125 Watt