Radeon RX 6700 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with Radeon RX 6700, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.86

RX 6700 outperforms P2000 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.90no data
Power efficiency17.3019.64
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP106Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)9 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242304
Core clock speed1076 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72352.8
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs64144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB10 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2000 18.86
RX 6700 49.94
+165%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
RX 6700 19242
+165%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−150%
140−150
+150%
1440p20
−150%
50−55
+150%
4K16
−150%
40−45
+150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45no data
1440p29.25no data
4K36.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Atomic Heart 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−157%
190−200
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Far Cry 5 47
−155%
120−130
+155%
Fortnite 144
−143%
350−400
+143%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−160%
190−200
+160%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
−164%
140−150
+164%
Valorant 130−140
−157%
350−400
+157%
Atomic Heart 45−50
−155%
120−130
+155%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−157%
190−200
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−149%
550−600
+149%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Dota 2 102
−165%
270−280
+165%
Far Cry 5 41
−144%
100−105
+144%
Fortnite 60
−150%
150−160
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−160%
190−200
+160%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−154%
170−180
+154%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−163%
100−105
+163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
−144%
100−105
+144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−163%
100−105
+163%
Valorant 130−140
−157%
350−400
+157%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−157%
190−200
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Dota 2 98
−155%
250−260
+155%
Far Cry 5 35
−157%
90−95
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−160%
190−200
+160%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
−159%
75−80
+159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−160%
65−70
+160%
Valorant 130−140
−157%
350−400
+157%
Fortnite 45
−144%
110−120
+144%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−133%
300−310
+133%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−156%
300−310
+156%
Valorant 170−180
−162%
450−500
+162%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry 5 21
−162%
55−60
+162%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−150%
110−120
+150%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Fortnite 24
−150%
60−65
+150%
Atomic Heart 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−131%
30−33
+131%
Valorant 100−105
−160%
260−270
+160%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dota 2 60−65
−158%
160−170
+158%
Far Cry 5 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
−157%
18−20
+157%
Fortnite 10
−140%
24−27
+140%

This is how Quadro P2000 and RX 6700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.86 49.94
Recency 6 February 2017 9 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 175 Watt

Quadro P2000 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6700, on the other hand, has a 164.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5
665 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
1407 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or Radeon RX 6700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.