AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro P2000
18.75

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms Quadro P2000 by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking275257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money14.141.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP106Polaris 20
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years old)5 June 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data
Current price$371 (0.6x MSRP)$5999
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2000 has 1209% better value for money than Pro 580.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242304
Core clock speed1076 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72172.8
Floating-point performance3,031 gflops6,175 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mm241 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz6780 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.75
Pro 580 20.01
+6.7%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms Quadro P2000 by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P2000 7268
Pro 580 7753
+6.7%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms Quadro P2000 by 7% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P2000 22533
Pro 580 37363
+65.8%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms Quadro P2000 by 66% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P2000 24052
Pro 580 43756
+81.9%

Radeon Pro 580 outperforms Quadro P2000 by 82% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
1440p20
−5%
21−24
+5%
4K16
+0%
16−18
+0%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Quadro P2000 and Pro 580 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro 580 is 5.3% faster than Quadro P2000

1440p resolution:

  • Pro 580 is 5% faster than Quadro P2000

4K resolution:

  • Pro 580 is 0% faster than Quadro P2000

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.75 20.01
Recency 6 February 2017 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and Radeon Pro 580. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 538 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 66 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.