Radeon PRO W7900 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 and Radeon PRO W7900, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.26

PRO W7900 outperforms P2000 by a whopping 299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.4120.03
Power efficiency17.1217.36
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGP106Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

PRO W7900 has 113% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246144
Core clock speed1076 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72958.1
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs40192
TMUs64384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm280 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB48 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2000 16.26
PRO W7900 64.84
+299%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
PRO W7900 28976
+299%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−293%
220−230
+293%
1440p20
−275%
75−80
+275%
4K16
−275%
60−65
+275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45
+74%
18.18
−74%
1440p29.25
+82.3%
53.32
−82.3%
4K36.56
+82.3%
66.65
−82.3%
  • Quadro P2000 has 74% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 has 82% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Quadro P2000 has 82% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−296%
400−450
+296%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−296%
400−450
+296%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Far Cry 5 47
−283%
180−190
+283%
Fortnite 144
−282%
550−600
+282%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−293%
220−230
+293%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
−296%
210−220
+296%
Valorant 130−140
−268%
500−550
+268%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Battlefield 5 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−296%
400−450
+296%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−286%
850−900
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Dota 2 102
−292%
400−450
+292%
Far Cry 5 41
−290%
160−170
+290%
Fortnite 60
−283%
230−240
+283%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−293%
220−230
+293%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
−288%
260−270
+288%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
−290%
160−170
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−295%
150−160
+295%
Valorant 130−140
−268%
500−550
+268%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−292%
290−300
+292%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Dota 2 98
−257%
350−400
+257%
Far Cry 5 35
−271%
130−140
+271%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
−279%
110−120
+279%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−280%
95−100
+280%
Valorant 130−140
−268%
500−550
+268%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
−278%
170−180
+278%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−288%
500−550
+288%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−294%
650−700
+294%
Valorant 170−180
−280%
650−700
+280%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−280%
190−200
+280%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Far Cry 5 21
−281%
80−85
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
−296%
95−100
+296%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−285%
50−55
+285%
Valorant 100−105
−250%
350−400
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Dota 2 60−65
−287%
240−250
+287%
Far Cry 5 9
−289%
35−40
+289%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
−286%
27−30
+286%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
−250%
35−40
+250%

This is how Quadro P2000 and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 293% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 275% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 275% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.26 64.84
Recency 6 February 2017 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 295 Watt

Quadro P2000 has 293.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 298.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 670 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 82 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or Radeon PRO W7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.