P2000 vs RTX 3000 Mobile

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 1334$
Games supported 86%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1076 MHz
  • Max video memory 5 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 7008 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 945
  • Max video memory 6144 MB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 14000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 2393$
Games supported 100%
Graphics card Graphics card NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating19320
Value for money9.0316.05
ArchitecturePascalTuring
GPU code nameGP106N19E-Q1
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date6 February 2017 (4 years ago)27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data
Price now$1334 (2.3x MSRP)$2393
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241920
Core clock speed1076 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)75 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72198.7
Floating-point performance3,031 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro P2000 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB6 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 27.25
RTX 3000 Mobile 72.17
+165%
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 43566
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+110%
Quadro P2000 6160
RTX 3000 Mobile 13570
+120%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P2000 6847
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+117%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P2000 8387
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+137%

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P2000 32964
RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+52.6%

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+39.2%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro P2000 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.19 kh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

1080p56
−66.1%
93
+66.1%
1440p20no data
4K16
−450%
88
+450%

1920x1080
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 47 no data

1920x1080
High Preset

Far Cry 5 41 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
−187%
109
+187%

1920x1080
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−124%
56
+124%

2560x1440
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 21 no data

3840x2160
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 no data

3840x2160
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 9 no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 27.25 72.17
Novelty 6 February 2017 27 May 2019
Memory bus width 160 192
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1024 1920
Memory bandwidth 140.2 448
Chip lithography 16 12
Thermal design power (TDP) 75 80

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro P2000 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro P2000 from AMD is FirePro W8100, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.

AMD FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P2000:

Competitors of Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile from AMD is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is slower by 46% and lower by 96 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


104 ratings
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
94 ratings
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.