HD Graphics P530 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2200 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Quadro P6000
VS
#ad 
Buy HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with HD Graphics P530, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
17.51
+576%

P2000 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 576% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking313816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.63no data
Power efficiency17.1112.65
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGP106Skylake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024192
Core clock speed1076 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate94.7218.40
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.4416 TFLOPS
ROPs403
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount5 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width160 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.1.97
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2000 17.51
+576%
HD Graphics P530 2.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
+577%
HD Graphics P530 1074

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+600%
8−9
−600%
1440p20
+900%
2−3
−900%
4K16
+700%
2−3
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45no data
1440p29.25no data
4K36.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1583%
6−7
−1583%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1583%
6−7
−1583%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Far Cry 5 47
+683%
6−7
−683%
Fortnite 144
+1008%
12−14
−1008%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+462%
12−14
−462%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+308%
12−14
−308%
Valorant 130−140
+209%
40−45
−209%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1583%
6−7
−1583%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+342%
50−55
−342%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Dota 2 102
+292%
24−27
−292%
Far Cry 5 41
+583%
6−7
−583%
Fortnite 60
+362%
12−14
−362%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+462%
12−14
−462%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+660%
5−6
−660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+215%
12−14
−215%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Valorant 130−140
+209%
40−45
−209%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Dota 2 98
+277%
24−27
−277%
Far Cry 5 35
+483%
6−7
−483%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+462%
12−14
−462%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+123%
12−14
−123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+178%
9−10
−178%
Valorant 130−140
+209%
40−45
−209%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+246%
12−14
−246%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+579%
18−20
−579%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+596%
24−27
−596%
Valorant 170−180
+613%
24−27
−613%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+614%
7−8
−614%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+633%
6−7
−633%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+380%
5−6
−380%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 95−100
+662%
12−14
−662%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 60−65
+786%
7−8
−786%
Far Cry 5 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+233%
3−4
−233%

This is how Quadro P2000 and HD Graphics P530 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 600% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 900% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P2000 is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P2000 surpassed HD Graphics P530 in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.51 2.59
Recency 6 February 2017 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 1740 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P2000 has a 576.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 194.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD Graphics P530, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics P530 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5500X
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
vs
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
GRID K1 GRID K1
vs
Quadro P1000 P1000
A800 PCIe 40 GB A800 PCIe 40 GB
vs
Quadro P1000 P1000
9800 GTX+ 9800 GTX+
vs
Quadro P400 P400
R7 M260X R7 M260X
vs
Quadro P600 P600
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
vs
Quadro P600 P600
Xbox Series X GPU Xbox Series X GPU
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
Quadro P620 P620
vs
M3000 SE M3000 SE
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
RTX 3060 Ti GA103 RTX 3060 Ti GA103
vs
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
vs
Quadro M4000 M4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 695 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 24 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or HD Graphics P530, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.