HD Graphics P530 vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 P6000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Apollo Lake GT1 5 P530 Iris Pro Graphics P555

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with HD Graphics P530, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
30.18
+1079%

P5000 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 1079% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking207846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.70no data
Power efficiency12.7913.01
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGP104Skylake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048192
Core clock speed1607 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate277.318.40
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS0.4416 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs16016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1127 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5000 30.18
+1079%
HD Graphics P530 2.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12645
+1077%
HD Graphics P530 1074

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
4K41
+1267%
3−4
−1267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87no data
4K60.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+2371%
7−8
−2371%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
God of War 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+2371%
7−8
−2371%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Fortnite 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+815%
12−14
−815%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+1840%
5−6
−1840%
God of War 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+846%
12−14
−846%
Valorant 190−200
+349%
40−45
−349%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+2371%
7−8
−2371%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+450%
50−55
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
Dota 2 130−140
+419%
24−27
−419%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Fortnite 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+815%
12−14
−815%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+1840%
5−6
−1840%
God of War 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+1429%
7−8
−1429%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+846%
12−14
−846%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+989%
9−10
−989%
Valorant 190−200
+349%
40−45
−349%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+1325%
8−9
−1325%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
Dota 2 130−140
+419%
24−27
−419%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+815%
12−14
−815%
God of War 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+846%
12−14
−846%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+489%
9−10
−489%
Valorant 190−200
+349%
40−45
−349%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+977%
12−14
−977%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+1083%
6−7
−1083%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+1026%
18−20
−1026%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Metro Exodus 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+629%
24−27
−629%
Valorant 220−230
+896%
21−24
−896%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+1700%
4−5
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+1267%
6−7
−1267%
God of War 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+2550%
2−3
−2550%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+1440%
5−6
−1440%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+281%
16−18
−281%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Valorant 180−190
+1323%
12−14
−1323%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 90−95
+1243%
7−8
−1243%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
God of War 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%

This is how Quadro P5000 and HD Graphics P530 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5000 is 1229% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5000 is 1267% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5000 surpassed HD Graphics P530 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.18 2.56
Recency 1 October 2016 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1740 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 1078.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 841.6% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD Graphics P530, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics P530 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P530
vs
HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
vs
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics
vs
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
HD 6770 Green Edition AMD Radeon HD 6770 Green Edition
vs
HD 7310 HD 7310
Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics
vs
HD 8180 HD 8180
GT 610 PCIe x1 NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
vs
HD 6290 HD 6290
RX 7900 GRE AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
vs
HD 6290 HD 6290
RTX 8200 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
vs
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
vs
R7 M445 R7 M445
RX 5770 AMD Radeon RX 5770
vs
HD Graphics 630 Graphics 630
Iris Graphics 540 Intel Iris Graphics 540
vs
GTX 1080 GTX 1080
ATI X1300 LE ATI Radeon X1300 LE
vs
GTX 1080 GTX 1080

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 191 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 26 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or HD Graphics P530, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.