HD Graphics 3000 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with HD Graphics 3000, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.05
+2765%

P2000 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 2765% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3001193
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.49no data
Power efficiency17.36no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameGP106Sandy Bridge GT2+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)1 February 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102496
Core clock speed1076 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million1,160 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate94.7215.60
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.2496 TFLOPS
ROPs402
TMUs6412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width160 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.05
+2765%
HD Graphics 3000 0.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
+2761%
HD Graphics 3000 254

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P2000 32964
+2002%
HD Graphics 3000 1568

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P2000 43566
+1641%
HD Graphics 3000 2503

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+544%
9
−544%
1440p200−1
4K170−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.09no data
1440p29.25no data
4K34.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1029%
7−8
−1029%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
Valorant 75−80
+3700%
2−3
−3700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Dota 2 34
+1033%
3
−1033%
Far Cry 5 72
+800%
8−9
−800%
Fortnite 100−110
+10000%
1−2
−10000%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1029%
7−8
−1029%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 137
+1422%
9−10
−1422%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+780%
5−6
−780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1080%
5−6
−1080%
Valorant 75−80
+3700%
2−3
−3700%
World of Tanks 220−230
+1936%
11
−1936%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Dota 2 98
+1300%
7
−1300%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+700%
8−9
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1029%
7−8
−1029%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
+344%
9−10
−344%
Valorant 75−80
+3700%
2−3
−3700%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+2825%
4−5
−2825%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130
+6350%
2−3
−6350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Valorant 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

This is how Quadro P2000 and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 544% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P2000 is 10000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is ahead in 35 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.05 0.63
Recency 6 February 2017 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 16 nm 32 nm

Quadro P2000 has a 2765.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation card while HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 661 vote

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 2511 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.