GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Quadro P2000

Place in performance ranking	278	197
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	13.92	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP106	GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	6 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$585	no data
Current price	$371 (0.6x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	1076 MHz	1237 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1492 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	94.72	no data
Floating-point performance	3,031 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P2000 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	160 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	140.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_2
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	no data
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.78

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.00
+33.1%

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Quadro P2000 by 33% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P2000 8387

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421
+108%

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Quadro P2000 by 108% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P2000 6847

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960
+74.7%

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Quadro P2000 by 75% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P2000 43566

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486
+66.4%

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Quadro P2000 by 66% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro P2000 350317

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 500518
+42.9%

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Quadro P2000 by 43% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	57 −24.6%	71 +24.6%
1440p	20 −65%	33 +65%
4K	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

−170%

81
+170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −28.9%	45−50 +28.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −37.5%	40−45 +37.5%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −28.6%	80−85 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −37.5%	65−70 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −113%	64 +113%
Far Cry 5	47 −76.6%	83 +76.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −29.4%	65−70 +29.4%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −27.7%	80−85 +27.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −38.9%	75−80 +38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −35%	50−55 +35%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −37.5%	55−60 +37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −33.3%	45−50 +33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −28.9%	45−50 +28.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −37.5%	40−45 +37.5%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −28.6%	80−85 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −37.5%	65−70 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −53.3%	46 +53.3%
Far Cry 5	41 −85.4%	76 +85.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −29.4%	65−70 +29.4%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −27.7%	80−85 +27.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −38.9%	75−80 +38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −35%	50−55 +35%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −37.5%	55−60 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 −139%	91 +139%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −33.3%	45−50 +33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −28.9%	45−50 +28.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −37.5%	40−45 +37.5%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −28.6%	80−85 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −30%	39 +30%
Far Cry 5	35 −103%	71 +103%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −29.4%	65−70 +29.4%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −27.7%	80−85 +27.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 −100%	50 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −33.3%	45−50 +33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −35.7%	35−40 +35.7%
Hitman 3	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −32%	30−35 +32%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −38.9%	24−27 +38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −37.5%	30−35 +37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −47.1%	24−27 +47.1%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −36.6%	55−60 +36.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	21 −148%	52 +148%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −33.3%	45−50 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −37.8%	50−55 +37.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −85%	37 +85%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −30%	12−14 +30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −108%	27−30 +108%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	9 −133%	21−24 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%

This is how Quadro P2000 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 25% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 65% faster in 1440p
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 31% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 170% faster than the Quadro P2000.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3050 6GB Mobile surpassed Quadro P2000 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.78	25.00
Recency	6 February 2017	6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt