Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 64

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with Radeon RX Vega 11, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.38
+89.1%

M2000 outperforms RX Vega 11 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.77no data
Power efficiency9.5310.80
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM206Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)10 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768704
Core clock speed796 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate55.8255.04
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4844

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length201 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1653 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2000 10.38
+89.1%
RX Vega 11 5.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2000 3991
+89.2%
RX Vega 11 2109

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+78.6%
28
−78.6%
1440p9−10
+80%
5
−80%
4K21−24
+75%
12
−75%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.76no data
1440p48.64no data
4K20.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+0%
17
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+0%
54
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
World of Tanks 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Elden Ring 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
World of Tanks 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+0%
15
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M2000 is 79% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M2000 is 80% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M2000 is 75% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.38 5.49
Recency 8 April 2016 10 May 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro M2000 has a 89.1% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 11, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
FirePro D300 FirePro D300
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro P500 Quadro P500
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 216 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1816 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.