GeForce 615 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	352	958
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.35	0.01
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP107GL	GF108
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	5 July 2017 (6 years ago)	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price	$426	$858

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P2000 Max-Q has 83400% better value for money than GeForce 615.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	48
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	660 MHz
Boost clock speed	1468 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	49 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	5.280
Floating-point performance	no data	126.7 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P2000 Max-Q and GeForce 615 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	no data	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.81
+879%

GeForce 615 1.41

Quadro P2000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce 615 by 879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P2000 Max-Q 5332
+878%

GeForce 615 545

Quadro P2000 Max-Q outperforms GeForce 615 by 878% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	52 +940%	5−6 −940%
4K	21 +950%	2−3 −950%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

200−210

+852%

21−24
−852%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	210−220 +855%	21−24 −855%
Battlefield 5	400−450 +789%	45−50 −789%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +852%	21−24 −852%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +838%	30−35 −838%
Far Cry New Dawn	350−400 +821%	35−40 −821%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +809%	65−70 −809%
Hitman 3	250−260 +862%	24−27 −862%
Horizon Zero Dawn	500−550 +793%	55−60 −793%
Metro Exodus	450−500 +878%	45−50 −878%
Red Dead Redemption 2	350−400 +797%	35−40 −797%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +830%	40−45 −830%
Watch Dogs: Legion	450−500 +878%	45−50 −878%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	210−220 +855%	21−24 −855%
Battlefield 5	400−450 +789%	45−50 −789%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +852%	21−24 −852%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +838%	30−35 −838%
Far Cry New Dawn	350−400 +821%	35−40 −821%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +809%	65−70 −809%
Hitman 3	250−260 +862%	24−27 −862%
Horizon Zero Dawn	500−550 +793%	55−60 −793%
Metro Exodus	450−500 +878%	45−50 −878%
Red Dead Redemption 2	350−400 +797%	35−40 −797%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +830%	40−45 −830%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	300−310 +838%	32 −838%
Watch Dogs: Legion	450−500 +878%	45−50 −878%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	210−220 +855%	21−24 −855%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Cyberpunk 2077	200−210 +852%	21−24 −852%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +838%	30−35 −838%
Forza Horizon 4	600−650 +809%	65−70 −809%
Horizon Zero Dawn	500−550 +793%	55−60 −793%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +830%	40−45 −830%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	240−250 +860%	25 −860%
Watch Dogs: Legion	450−500 +878%	45−50 −878%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

350−400

+797%

35−40
−797%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	260−270 +863%	27−30 −863%
Far Cry New Dawn	240−250 +860%	24−27 −860%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +829%	14−16 −829%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +809%	10−12 −809%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	160−170 +841%	16−18 −841%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +829%	7−8 −829%
Far Cry 5	210−220 +855%	21−24 −855%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +862%	24−27 −862%
Hitman 3	160−170 +841%	16−18 −841%
Horizon Zero Dawn	270−280 +864%	27−30 −864%
Metro Exodus	230−240 +858%	24−27 −858%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 +858%	24−27 −858%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +829%	14−16 −829%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +838%	8−9 −838%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

220−230

+857%

21−24
−857%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +823%	12−14 −823%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +850%	10−11 −850%
Hitman 3	95−100 +850%	10−11 −850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +833%	14−16 −833%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +800%	3 −800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +817%	12 −817%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +838%	8−9 −838%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +817%	6−7 −817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +829%	7−8 −829%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +829%	7−8 −829%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +844%	18−20 −844%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +833%	14−16 −833%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +823%	12−14 −823%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +800%	5−6 −800%