Radeon RX 6800 vs Quadro P1000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with Radeon RX 6800, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
10.02

RX 6800 outperforms P1000 by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42549
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.5650.08
Power efficiency19.9715.77
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $579

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6800 has 801% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403840
Core clock speed1493 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate48.61505.2
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPS16.17 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P1000 10.02
RX 6800 49.49
+394%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4480
RX 6800 22129
+394%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P1000 6001
RX 6800 55084
+818%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P1000 24240
RX 6800 106236
+338%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P1000 4787
RX 6800 45441
+849%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P1000 30721
RX 6800 205274
+568%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Quadro P1000 42
RX 6800 214
+406%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Quadro P1000 87
RX 6800 232
+168%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Quadro P1000 56
RX 6800 171
+207%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Quadro P1000 54
RX 6800 319
+491%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Quadro P1000 57
RX 6800 140
+145%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Quadro P1000 15
RX 6800 123
+726%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Quadro P1000 27
RX 6800 212
+672%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Quadro P1000 4
RX 6800 36
+828%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Quadro P1000 53
RX 6800 354
+568%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−295%
174
+295%
1440p18−21
−461%
101
+461%
4K11
−464%
62
+464%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.52
−156%
3.33
+156%
1440p20.83
−263%
5.73
+263%
4K34.09
−265%
9.34
+265%
  • RX 6800 has 156% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 has 263% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 has 265% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−870%
262
+870%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−493%
350
+493%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−514%
135
+514%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−633%
198
+633%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−227%
150−160
+227%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−492%
349
+492%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−423%
115
+423%
Far Cry 5 32
−516%
197
+516%
Fortnite 60−65
−266%
230−240
+266%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−336%
200−210
+336%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−582%
232
+582%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−354%
170−180
+354%
Valorant 95−100
−195%
290−300
+195%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−344%
120
+344%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−227%
150−160
+227%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−339%
259
+339%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−74.8%
270−280
+74.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−373%
104
+373%
Dota 2 75−80
−90.8%
145
+90.8%
Far Cry 5 29
−541%
186
+541%
Fortnite 60−65
−266%
230−240
+266%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−336%
200−210
+336%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−518%
210
+518%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−288%
159
+288%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−568%
147
+568%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−354%
170−180
+354%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−797%
269
+797%
Valorant 95−100
−195%
290−300
+195%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−227%
150−160
+227%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−350%
99
+350%
Dota 2 75−80
−68.4%
128
+68.4%
Far Cry 5 27
−544%
174
+544%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−336%
200−210
+336%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−354%
170−180
+354%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−850%
152
+850%
Valorant 95−100
−195%
290−300
+195%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−266%
230−240
+266%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−775%
175
+775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
−359%
350−400
+359%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−681%
125
+681%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−585%
89
+585%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−165%
170−180
+165%
Valorant 110−120
−176%
300−350
+176%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−364%
130−140
+364%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−722%
74
+722%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−609%
163
+609%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−542%
160−170
+542%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−565%
110−120
+565%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−543%
140−150
+543%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−840%
47
+840%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−500%
132
+500%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−686%
55
+686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−662%
99
+662%
Valorant 55−60
−426%
300−350
+426%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1260%
65−70
+1260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
34
+750%
Dota 2 40−45
−155%
102
+155%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−727%
91
+727%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−526%
110−120
+526%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−820%
90−95
+820%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−680%
75−80
+680%

This is how Quadro P1000 and RX 6800 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 is 295% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 is 461% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 is 464% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 is 1260% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6800 surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.02 49.49
Recency 7 February 2017 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P1000 has 525% lower power consumption.

RX 6800, on the other hand, has a 393.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 595 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2029 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or Radeon RX 6800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.