Iris Graphics 550 vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.54
+222%

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking384680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.29no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGP107Skylake GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 February 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data
Current price$301 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64048
Core clock speed1493 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate59.2052.80
Floating-point performance1,894 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P1000 and Iris Graphics 550 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 BiteDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.21.1.97
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.54
+222%
Iris Graphics 550 3.58

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P1000 4455
+211%
Iris Graphics 550 1431

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by 211% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 6001
+137%
Iris Graphics 550 2534

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by 137% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P1000 24240
+148%
Iris Graphics 550 9761

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by 148% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 4787
+191%
Iris Graphics 550 1648

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by 191% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P1000 30721
+137%
Iris Graphics 550 12986

Quadro P1000 outperforms Iris Graphics 550 by 137% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+87%
23
−87%
1440p90−95
+221%
28
−221%
4K160−170
+220%
50
−220%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

This is how Quadro P1000 and Iris Graphics 550 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 87% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 221% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P1000 is 220% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.54 3.58
Recency 1 February 2017 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation card while Iris Graphics 550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Iris Graphics 550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 486 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 50 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.