GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro NVS 510M

Place in performance ranking	1160	17
Place by popularity	not in top-100	31
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	26.87
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	G71	AD104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	21 August 2006 (17 years ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599
Current price	$105	$791 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 has 268600% better value for money than NVS 510M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	5888
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1920 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2475 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	455.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro NVS 510M and GeForce RTX 4070 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 510M 0.62

RTX 4070 69.87
+11169%

GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 11169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 510M 238

RTX 4070 26984
+11238%

GeForce RTX 4070 outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 11238% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −20600%	207 +20600%
1440p	1−2 −12100%	122 +12100%
4K	0−1	73

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

216

−11150%

24300−24350
+11150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −11161%	12500−12550 +11161%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −11160%	13850−13900 +11160%
Battlefield 5	220−230 −11150%	25200−25250 +11150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −11161%	13400−13450 +11161%
Cyberpunk 2077	174 −11164%	19600−19650 +11164%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −11139%	13150−13200 +11139%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 −11157%	19250−19300 +11157%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −11161%	24550−24600 +11161%
Hitman 3	120−130 −11130%	13700−13750 +11130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	470 −11166%	52950−53000 +11166%
Metro Exodus	140−150 −11150%	16200−16250 +11150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −11150%	13950−14000 +11150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	482 −11166%	54300−54350 +11166%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −11159%	15200−15250 +11159%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −11161%	12500−12550 +11161%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −11160%	13850−13900 +11160%
Battlefield 5	220−230 −11150%	25200−25250 +11150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −11161%	13400−13450 +11161%
Cyberpunk 2077	143 −11159%	16100−16150 +11159%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −11139%	13150−13200 +11139%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 −11157%	19250−19300 +11157%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −11161%	24550−24600 +11161%
Hitman 3	120−130 −11130%	13700−13750 +11130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	290−300 −11154%	33200−33250 +11154%
Metro Exodus	84 −11150%	9450−9500 +11150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −11150%	13950−14000 +11150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	376 −11163%	42350−42400 +11163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	351 −11168%	39550−39600 +11168%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −11159%	15200−15250 +11159%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −11161%	12500−12550 +11161%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −11160%	13850−13900 +11160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −11161%	13400−13450 +11161%
Cyberpunk 2077	128 −11150%	14400−14450 +11150%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −11139%	13150−13200 +11139%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −11161%	24550−24600 +11161%
Horizon Zero Dawn	293 −11163%	33000−33050 +11163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	322 −11158%	36250−36300 +11158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170 −11165%	19150−19200 +11165%
Watch Dogs: Legion	124 −11150%	13950−14000 +11150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

−11150%

13950−14000
+11150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 −11142%	18550−18600 +11142%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 −11150%	16200−16250 +11150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 −11120%	9200−9250 +11120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85−90 −11164%	9800−9850 +11164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −11126%	11900−11950 +11126%
Cyberpunk 2077	81 −11135%	9100−9150 +11135%
Far Cry 5	171 −11157%	19250−19300 +11157%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −11150%	18900−18950 +11150%
Hitman 3	100−110 −11125%	11450−11500 +11125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	222 −11161%	25000−25050 +11161%
Metro Exodus	143 −11159%	16100−16150 +11159%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	222 −11161%	25000−25050 +11161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −11160%	14300−14350 +11160%
Watch Dogs: Legion	93 −11137%	10450−10500 +11137%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−11161%

12950−13000
+11161%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −11150%	9900−9950 +11150%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −11132%	7750−7800 +11132%
Hitman 3	60−65 −11130%	6850−6900 +11130%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −11162%	12050−12100 +11162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	84 −11150%	9450−9500 +11150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	115 −11161%	12950−13000 +11161%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −11107%	6500−6550 +11107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −11082%	6150−6200 +11082%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −11150%	5850−5900 +11150%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 −11150%	4050−4100 +11150%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −11100%	5600−5650 +11100%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −11140%	13600−13650 +11140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130 −11169%	14650−14700 +11169%
Metro Exodus	96 −11150%	10800−10850 +11150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50 −11100%	5600−5650 +11100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80

−11150%

8550−8600
+11150%

This is how NVS 510M and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 is 20600% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 is 12100% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.62	69.87
Recency	21 August 2006	13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	12 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	200 Watt