Arc A550M vs Quadro NVS 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 320M with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

NVS 320M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, GDDR2, 20 Watt
0.54

Arc A550M outperforms NVS 320M by a whopping 4294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1184214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG8x (2007−2008)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameG84MAlchemist
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 June 2007 (17 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$66 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed575 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2005 MHz
Number of transistors289 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt80 Watt (60 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate9.200115.2
Floating-point performance73.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro NVS 320M and Arc A550M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Hitman 3 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−4290%
1800−1850
+4290%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−4259%
3400−3450
+4259%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−4264%
2400−2450
+4264%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4275%
4550−4600
+4275%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−4259%
3400−3450
+4259%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4275%
2800−2850
+4275%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−4290%
1800−1850
+4290%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−4259%
3400−3450
+4259%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−4264%
2400−2450
+4264%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4275%
4550−4600
+4275%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−4259%
3400−3450
+4259%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4275%
2800−2850
+4275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−4290%
1800−1850
+4290%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−4264%
2400−2450
+4264%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−4275%
4550−4600
+4275%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4275%
2800−2850
+4275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−4233%
1950−2000
+4233%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−4200%
2150−2200
+4200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−4248%
1000−1050
+4248%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4262%
2050−2100
+4262%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−4233%
1950−2000
+4233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−4214%
2200−2250
+4214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−4210%
1250−1300
+4210%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−4018%
700−750
+4018%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−4248%
1000−1050
+4248%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−4067%
750−800
+4067%
Hitman 3 18−20
−4111%
800−850
+4111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−4275%
700−750
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−4100%
1050−1100
+4100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−4131%
550−600
+4131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−4131%
550−600
+4131%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−4100%
210−220
+4100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−4131%
550−600
+4131%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−4294%
1450−1500
+4294%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−3900%
400−450
+3900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 23.73
Recency 9 June 2007 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 80 Watt

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A550M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 70 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.