Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs Quadro NVS 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 130M and Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 130M
2007
256 MB DDR2, 10 Watt
0.25

RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforms NVS 130M by a whopping 8492% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.7124.54
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86TU106
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82304
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1215 MHz
Number of transistors210 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600175.0
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS5.599 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 130M 0.25
RTX 3000 Max-Q 21.48
+8492%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 130M 97
RTX 3000 Max-Q 8278
+8434%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−174
1440p0−146
4K-0−132

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3150%
65
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2100%
88
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1175%
100−110
+1175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1675%
70−75
+1675%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1550%
66
+1550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1175%
100−110
+1175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1675%
70−75
+1675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1175%
100−110
+1175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1675%
70−75
+1675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−478%
52
+478%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−17.9%
33
+17.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Hitman 3 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2100%
40−45
+2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2250%
47
+2250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 19

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+0%
77
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 67
+0%
67
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+0%
66
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 24
+0%
24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+0%
12
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Max-Q is 3150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Max-Q is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 21.48
Recency 9 May 2007 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 60 Watt

NVS 130M has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 8492% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 130M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.