Radeon Pro W6600 vs Quadro M620

Place in performance ranking	510	92
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.49	22.51
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 23
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649
Current price	$1958	$1522 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro W6600 has 4494% better value for money than Quadro M620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1792
Core clock speed	1018 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	977 MHz	2903 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.26	325.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M620 and Radeon Pro W6600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.25

Pro W6600 40.98
+465%

Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms Quadro M620 by 465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M620 2798

Pro W6600 15824
+466%

Radeon Pro W6600 outperforms Quadro M620 by 466% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	23 −465%	130−140 +465%
4K	16 −463%	90−95 +463%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−1000%

10−12
+1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Hitman 3	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Hitman 3	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −533%	19 +533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −600%	27−30 +600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−567%

20−22

+567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	3−4

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
−500%

12−14

+500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	5−6
Hitman 3	0−1	3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	4−5

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−600%

7−8
+600%

This is how Quadro M620 and Pro W6600 compete in popular games:

Pro W6600 is 465% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600 is 463% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.25	40.98
Recency	13 January 2017	8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	100 Watt