Quadro T1000 vs M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Quadro M620
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
7.25

T1000 outperforms M620 by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking510300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.508.78
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGM107TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date13 January 2017 (7 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$1958 $920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 1656% better value for money than Quadro M620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1018 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate31.26no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M620 and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5012 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.25
Quadro T1000 16.95
+134%

T1000 outperforms M620 by 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M620 2801
Quadro T1000 6549
+134%

T1000 outperforms M620 by 134% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M620 7976
Quadro T1000 33828
+324%

T1000 outperforms M620 by 324% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro M620 6897
Quadro T1000 30312
+339%

T1000 outperforms M620 by 339% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M620 8602
Quadro T1000 34236
+298%

T1000 outperforms M620 by 298% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−120%
55−60
+120%
4K13
−131%
30−35
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Hitman 3 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Hitman 3 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−111%
40−45
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−110%
21−24
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Hitman 3 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Hitman 3 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

This is how Quadro M620 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 120% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro T1000 is 131% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.25 16.95
Recency 13 January 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 163 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 320 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.