NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs AMD FirePro M6000
Comparison of Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
14.02 GTexel / s
32 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
n / a
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
80 GB / s
72 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro M600M 7.51
FirePro M6000 8.65 +15.2%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro M600M 2911 +20.2%
FirePro M6000 2422
3DMark Vantage Performance
Quadro M600M 12734 +18.5%
FirePro M6000 10744
Let's see how good Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 1 July 2012)
Higher memory bandwidth (80 vs 72 GB/s)
Less power hungry (30 vs 43 watts)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD FirePro M6000
15.2% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (640 vs 384)
So, Quadro M600M or FirePro M6000?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD FirePro M6000.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M600M and FirePro M6000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.