GeForce GTX 880M vs Quadro M5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5500 with GeForce GTX 880M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5500
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
20.49
+108%

Quadro M5500 outperforms GTX 880M by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking251421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.910.98
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM204N15E-GX-A2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date4 April 2016 (8 years ago)12 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$1700 $1544

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M5500 has 197% better value for money than GTX 880M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed1139 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1140 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors5200 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate149.1127.1
Floating-point performanceno data3,050 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5500 and GeForce GTX 880M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationno dataGDDR5
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6606 MHzUp to 2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportno dataUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportno dataUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportno dataUp to 3840x2160
HDMIno data+
HDCP content protectionno data+
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMIno data+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreamingno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoderno data+
Optimusno data+
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5500 20.49
+108%
GTX 880M 9.85

Quadro M5500 outperforms GeForce GTX 880M by 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M5500 7915
+108%
GTX 880M 3803

Quadro M5500 outperforms GeForce GTX 880M by 108% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p280−290
+107%
135
−107%
Full HD110−120
+93%
57
−93%
4K45−50
+87.5%
24
−87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

This is how Quadro M5500 and GTX 880M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5500 is 107% faster in 900p
  • Quadro M5500 is 93% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5500 is 88% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.49 9.85
Recency 4 April 2016 12 March 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 122 Watt

The Quadro M5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5500 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 880M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 34 votes

Rate Quadro M5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 105 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.