Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Quadro M5000M

Place in the ranking	303	558
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.63	9.54
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GM204	Baffin
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,536	896
Core clock speed	975 MHz	1002 MHz
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	1053 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	93.60	58.97
Floating-point processing power	2.995 TFLOPS	1.887 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	16
TMUs	96	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M5000M 18.30
+165%

Pro WX 4150 6.91

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M5000M 7038
+165%

Pro WX 4150 2658

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

86
+187%

30−35

−187%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Elden Ring	55−60 +217%	18−20 −217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +168%	21−24 −168%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +171%	27−30 −171%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +115%	20−22 −115%
Valorant	70−75 +236%	21−24 −236%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +168%	21−24 −168%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Dota 2	65−70 +171%	24−27 −171%
Elden Ring	55−60 +217%	18−20 −217%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +103%	30−35 −103%
Fortnite	95−100 +141%	40−45 −141%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +171%	27−30 −171%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +171%	24−27 −171%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +125%	55−60 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +115%	20−22 −115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +171%	21−24 −171%
Valorant	70−75 +236%	21−24 −236%
World of Tanks	220−230 +106%	100−110 −106%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +168%	21−24 −168%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Dota 2	65−70 +171%	24−27 −171%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +103%	30−35 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +171%	27−30 −171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +125%	55−60 −125%
Valorant	70−75 +236%	21−24 −236%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Elden Ring	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +314%	7−8 −314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +337%	35−40 −337%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
World of Tanks	120−130 +152%	50−55 −152%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +208%	12−14 −208%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +243%	14−16 −243%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +254%	12−14 −254%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +310%	10−11 −310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Valorant	45−50 +161%	18−20 −161%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Dota 2	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Elden Ring	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +82.4%	16−18 −82.4%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 +175%	20−22 −175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +82.4%	16−18 −82.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Dota 2	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +188%	8−9 −188%
Fortnite	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Valorant	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%

This is how M5000M and Pro WX 4150 compete in popular games:

M5000M is 187% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the M5000M is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, M5000M surpassed Pro WX 4150 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.30	6.91
Recency	18 August 2015	1 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt